Democracy at Stake
Lt. Governor Kounalakis is facing backlash for her attempts to disqualify former President Donald Trump from appearing on California’s ballots in 2024. Critics argue that this move goes against the fundamental principles of democracy.
“Legal Maneuvers”
In a scathing statement, Kennedy, a prominent political figure, criticized Kounalakis, stating, “Someone needs to explain to Lt. Governor Kounalakis that in democracy, we choose candidates by VOTING, not by legal maneuvers to get them off the ballot.” He further accused Kounalakis of being deeply entrenched in the Democratic party establishment.
Comparisons to Banana Republics
Kennedy drew a parallel between Kounalakis’ actions and those seen in “banana republics and authoritarian countries,” where voters are only given a limited choice of approved candidates. He warned that our democracy is beginning to resemble such systems.
Restoring Real Democracy
Kennedy emphasized the importance of restoring real democracy and mobilizing an engaged citizenry. He believes that electing him as President is just one step towards achieving this goal.
Kounalakis’ Justification
Kounalakis defended her actions, pointing to the Colorado Supreme Court’s recent decision to disqualify Trump from the state’s ballots. She argued that Trump’s role in inciting the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol renders him ineligible to stand for presidential re-election.
Rule of Law and Democracy
Kounalakis insisted that her actions are about upholding the rule of law and protecting the pillars of democracy. She stated that California must determine if Trump’s disqualification in Colorado should also apply in their state.
The Constitution’s Requirements
Highlighting the constitutional requirements for presidential candidates, Kounalakis reminded the secretary of state that candidates must be at least 35 years old and not be involved in insurrectionist activities. She emphasized the significance of this matter, stating it puts the sanctity of the constitution and democracy at stake.
Colorado’s Decision as a Precedent
Kounalakis expressed belief that the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision could serve as a basis for California’s decision. She argues that if the former president is deemed ineligible in one state, it would be unjust to list him as a candidate in another.
Controversy and Appeals
It is important to note that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling is currently stayed until January 4, 2024, due to anticipated appeals. Three justices on the court dissented from the 4-3 decision.
Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner contributed reporting.